TL;DR
Get furniture and decor delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
A Sept. 26 essay from Marc and Angel Hack Life argues that people can get stuck by trying to control what lies outside their influence or by avoiding painful experiences. It recommends acknowledging difficult feelings and taking small, consistent steps toward addressing them; the article presents this as personal advice, not a clinical finding.
Marc and Angel Hack Life published an essay on Sept. 26 arguing that people may delay addressing difficult experiences by trying to control circumstances beyond their influence or by telling themselves to move on. The authors recommend recognizing what is within one’s control and taking small, consistent steps to work through what remains unresolved. The piece offers personal guidance; it does not report new research or establish a clinical treatment method.
The essay begins with a distinction drawn from the Serenity Prayer: people can work to change some things, while other outcomes are beyond their control. It cites other people’s actions, tomorrow’s weather and whether efforts are appreciated as matters that depend on factors outside an individual’s decisions. The authors say efforts to force those outcomes can add frustration and unhappiness.
The article applies that distinction to emotional pain. It argues that telling someone simply to “get over it” may leave unresolved experiences unaddressed, and compares emotional scars to physical wounds that can heal differently depending on how they are treated. This is an analogy used by the authors, not medical evidence presented in the piece.
As an alternative to expecting immediate, major change, the authors recommend moving through difficult experiences one step at a time. They describe a period about 15 years earlier when they were grieving two loved ones lost to self-harm and illness, including one author’s brother. They say progress felt difficult then, and use the experience to explain why small actions and consistency can matter.
Why Small Steps Matter
The essay’s central point is that action can begin with what a person can influence, even when the broader situation cannot be changed quickly. That framing may help readers think about what they can do next without assuming they can control other people or guarantee a particular outcome.
The distinction matters because the article addresses a familiar tension: avoiding painful issues can feel easier in the moment, while facing them can feel overwhelming. The authors suggest that gradual efforts may be more manageable than waiting for one defining moment or demanding a rapid recovery. Their advice is reflective rather than prescriptive; the article does not show that this approach works for everyone or replace professional support.
For readers, the practical takeaway is modest: identify one action within reach and keep at it, rather than treating the whole problem as something that must be solved at once. The essay frames that approach as a way to work toward change, not as a promise of a specific result.
The Essay’s Control-and-Change Argument
The article draws on a long-standing idea associated with the Serenity Prayer: distinguish between what can be changed and what must be accepted. It also quotes the Stoic philosopher Epictetus, who separated a person’s own judgments and actions from matters outside their control. These references provide the essay’s philosophical frame.
It then uses an example from “The Good Morning Journal,” an excerpt included in the source article, to illustrate how a small shift can compound over time. A one-degree change in direction, it says, can produce a large difference over a long journey. The example is illustrative; it is not evidence about psychological outcomes.
The headline refers to a step people may take too late, but the article’s central recommendation is broader: begin addressing unresolved difficulties in manageable increments. It does not identify a single deadline or one universally applicable step.
““God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.””
— Marc and Angel Hack Life, quoting the Serenity Prayer
Limits of the Advice
The essay does not cite studies or clinical experts to establish how broadly its recommendations apply. It also does not define what kinds of unresolved experiences readers should address on their own, or when someone may need support from a mental health professional. Its account of grief is personal, and the article does not claim that small steps will resolve every difficult situation.
What Readers Can Take Forward
The article does not announce a program, follow-up study or scheduled next development. Its suggested next step for readers is to identify a small action within their control and continue consistently. The source also points to “The Good Morning Journal,” from which it reproduces an excerpt, but gives no further details here about a related release or event.
Key Questions
What is the step the essay says people may delay?
The article urges readers to face difficult experiences and work through them in small, steady increments, instead of suppressing them or expecting a single dramatic turning point.
When was the essay published?
Marc and Angel Hack Life published it on Sept. 26, 2026.
Does the article provide clinical evidence for its advice?
The source presents personal reflections, philosophical references and examples. It does not cite clinical research establishing that its approach works for everyone.
What does the essay say is within a person’s control?
Drawing on Epictetus, it points to a person’s own opinions, choices and actions, while describing other people’s behavior and many external outcomes as outside individual control.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
